I saw a documentary about animal’s life and I couldn’t watch a tiger hunting, killing and eating a deer or a komodo dragon eating a buffalo. All these as I was eating my Sainsbury’s chicken… LOL
J O E P V A N L I E S H O U T
Joep van Lieshout, sculptor and visionary. Over the past two decades, Atelier Van Lieshout has produced a veritable cornucopia of works which straddle art, design and architecture: sculpture and installations, buildings and furniture, utopias and dystopias. What these works have in common are a number of recurring themes, motives and obsessions: systems, power, autarky, life, sex, death. The human individual in the face of a greater whole.
Van Lieshout wants his work to be integrated into daily life and not just simply viewed. In fact, he often uses design to express his artistic ideas. Joep van Lieshout is fascinated by the functionality of complex systems. One of the systems that keeps coming back in his work is the body.
He wants his work to be integrated into daily life and not just simply viewed. He fascinated by the functionality of complex systems
A N D R E A Z I T T E L
‘ I don’t want people to be uncomfortable, but I don’t want them to feel comfortable, either,’’ Zittel tells me. ‘‘You know when you’re alone with yourself and you feel jangly and on edge? But in a way that’s the most cathartic thing in the world? Almost painful, but so good?’’
She wants to improve the way we live in ways both extremely ambitious and extremely modest, her projects explore isolationism. Her work is often characterised by its utter practicality. She lives inside her work and wear it
*(please listen with headphones)
Through the 1:1 tutorial with my tutor we discussed about projects that I am thinking of doing. One of them is Walking on the ceiling that I have previously mentioned. She suggest me to look at Bruce Nauman and especially his work Slow Angle Walk (Beckett Walk) (1968).
Using his body to explore the limits of everyday situations, Nauman explored video as a theatrical stage. Adopt his body as an art object, executing repetitive performance actions in his studio. Exploiting the phenomenology of the medium, including its immediacy, space, and intimacy, his real-time gestures investigate the very process of making art through his playful frames.
This work definitely connects with the project Walking on the ceiling. The use of his body and the disconnection from the daily routine that escalates in space is exactly what I am interested in. I found really interested also his piece Bouncing in the Corner and Dance or Walk on the Perimeter of a Square.
Lygia Clark is also one of the artists that my tutor also recommended me. I read the essay ‘Lygia Clark: In Search of the Body’ by Guy Brett to learn about her work. In his essay he says how Clark from monochrome paintings and neo-constructivist sculptures, she explored sensory perception and psychic interaction. The final phase of her work is actual psychotherapy and healing. One of her works, ‘Baba antropofagica’, it was inspired by her dreams. I found many similarities with her work and the piece ‘When I am underwater I feel free’ that I have made. Clark is dealing with art like psychotherapy and she believed that an interaction is possible with experiences locked in the body’s memory, in a nonverbal or preverbal level. And how this process can also have therapeutic potential.
Franz Erhard Walther ‘Activation’ . The formal simplicity of his sculptural objects created out of textiles, paper, and steel are reminiscent of Minimalism. However, for Walther the so-called work sets also become part of the work with the aid of the artist or the viewer—predefined sequences of movements that can be performed with the objects.
In this lecture we talked about practices that deal with particular, singular sites. Lawrence Alloway in his essay: “Sites/Nonsites,” from the book “The Writings of Robert Smithson”, he states “The relation of a Nonsite to the Site is also like that of language to the world: it is a signifier and the Site is that which is signified.”
Walter De Maria created the earthwork, The Lightning Field, 1977 in New Mexico. It is comprised of 400 polished stainless steel poles installed in a grid array measuring one mile by one kilometer. The poles – two inches in diameter and averaging 20 feet and 7½ inches in height – are spaced 220 feet apart and have solid pointed tips that define a horizontal plane. A sculpture to be walked in as well as viewed, The Lightning Field is intended to be experienced over an extended period of time. The maximum number of visitors is six and the field is so big that is possible to not see each other if you want. De Maria selected this part of New Mexico precisely because of the relatively high incidence of electrical storms. Although lightning storms typically occur in this area from mid-July through August, and may also occur at other times during the visiting season, the probability of lightning during your visit cannot be predicted. Walter De Maria created an experience in a specific place that you can go for as long as you want and live the whole experience. You may also not see the ‘act’ of her work as you don’t know what the weather is going to be. The work cannot be moved. It is made for this specific place and the viewer has to travel there to see it.
In Measurement Room, 1969 by Mel Bochner the gallery space itself becomes the art-work. The measurement allows the viewer to become aware of their surroundings while being literally framed. For Bochner the measurements were an objective and rational system of knowledge but essentially meaningless. Although they allow a reduction of the world to the condition of human understanding, they are transparent and reveal nothingness. Once again the artwork cannot be moved and is made specifically for this room/space.
Through the Theory Lecture, ‘Material and Dematerialisation‘, at Chelsea College of Arts, we talked about art as an idea and we looked at several artists. One of them that got me interested was Richard Long. One of his pieces is Ben Nevis Hitch-Hike. He walked and hitch-hiked from London to the summit of Ben Nevis and back. The journey took six days, and at 11am each day he took two photographs. For one photograph he pointed the camera straight up, and for the other he pointed it straight down. The photographs which appear in the work are the only ones taken on the journey. I found many similarities to this work with my art practise. This different journey through these images that the artist captured. Some unexpected photos from a trip and these are the only images that he has from it. This is what he chose to capture with his camera. Looking up and looking down. Not straight ahead.
One of the other works of Long is A line Made by Walking, 1967, the artist made this work while he was still a student. Long(Tufnell 2007, p.39.) commented about his work, ‘Nature has always been recorded by artists, from prehistoric cave paintings to twentieth-century landscape photography. I too wanted to make nature the subject of my work, but in new ways. I started working outside using natural materials like grass and water, and this evolved into the idea of making a sculpture by walking … My first work made by walking, in 1967, was a straight line in a grass field, which was also my own path, going ‘nowhere’. In the subsequent early map works, recording very simple but precise walks on Exmoor and Dartmoor, my intention was to make a new art which was also a new way of walking: walking as art.’
Although no human figure appears in Long’s photograph, A Line Made By Walking presents a trace of corporeal presence and bodily action.
According to Bourdon (1968, p.107), when not on exhibition, the pieces are dismantled and cease to exist except as ideas. The dematerialisation of his sculptures makes it impossible for Andre to indulge himself in wasteful activities like polishing and shining and leaves him more time for the creation of his “shaped” poetry, analogous to his sculpture in that it consists of monosyllabic words blocked out in regular, orderly arrangements.
Each of Andre’s Equivalent series consists of a rectangular arrangement of 120 firebricks. Although the shape of each sculpture is different, they all have the same height, mass and volume, and are therefore ‘equivalent’ to each other. Andre’s sculptures are often assembled using common industrial materials, which he arranges into a simple geometric pattern. His sculptures are always placed on the floor rather than on plinths. Not simply objects to look at, they become part of the environment, altering the viewer’s relationship to the surrounding space.
Battcock, G. (ed.) (1968) Minimal Art: A critical Anthology. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Tufnell, B (ed.), Richard Long: Selected Statements & Interviews, London 2007, p.39.
Last summer I went with my boyfriend to Italy. I have a film camera with a manual lens and my boyfriend took me some photos. He has never before used a film camera. I told him several times what he had to do and how to focus to what he wants to photograph. After we return to Athens I took the film to developing and scanning. These are all the photos I have of me in Italy. At the beginning I got really upset, after a while I found it really funny. In almost all of the photos the background is focused and I am blurred. What is the main subject of the photo? In the beginning we want the main subject will be me in Italy. This is the obvious think, right? But why is it obvious? A photo is for us to have a memory. What do I want to remember? Me in Italy or Italy? These photos look like they are not correctly shot, because we have used of a certain way of photographing certain things. I believe that this is also linked with space and how we perceive things.
I hope I will finish it until the exhibition day. I am really enjoying the process of making it. I talked with Will, that I met at the day we did the sound capsule at CG11, and we will meet on Monday to talk. I want to help me with the sound I will put inside my sculpture. I have already talked with some friends from Greece that are making music and they have told me that my idea could be done. It’s a bit difficult to explain what I want because I don’t know exactly what I want.
t h o u g h t s a n d i d e a s t h r o u g h t h i s s e m i n a r :
How we perceive space nowadays. What is space. What we see in a space and what we don’t and why we don’t. Certain things we do in certain spaces. How we name these certain spaces that we do these certain things. Is it obvious or not.
Through my research for my project I wanted to read more about the idea of a space into another space and about “space” in general. I asked my tutor Bernice Donszelmann to advice me some books. One of them was “Species of Spaces and Other Pieces” by George Perec. A few days later I went to the second day of the seminar that I chose to attend by Tim O’ Riley. He had also brought the same book and a few more by George Perec. While I was in the seminar and we were talking about the book and about space in general I remembered a game we used to play with my sister when we were kids. We used to walk around our house by looking only the ceiling. Walking on what we were seeing on the ceiling and passing the obstacles we were seeing on the ceiling. I remember that I had the feeling that I was literally walking on the ceiling. I try to do the same game at my flat here in London but I didn’t really felt the same. I think is because I am taller now. I felt really dizzy actually. I recorded it and here is the video. I found it really interesting that when we were kids we found a whole world in there and now for me is just the ceiling. I am thinking of doing wooden maquettes of ceilings as corridors and the same with walls. I want to transform walls to floor and ceiling to floor. And also record myself doing this game in a bigger space. I think this project is related to the work i am doing now. I am really interested at transforming space and I want to deal more with this idea.
w a l k i n g f r o m m y l i v i n g r o o m t o m y b a t h r o o m o n m y c e i l i n g :
In our studio group crits my tutor Bernice advised me to look at Pipilotti Rist‘ s work. I found her work really interesting and inspiring. I watch this interview of her at youtube saying that from when she was a child she had this will of making rooms with moving life and films. She creates her own space out of the common sense. Films and sound surrounding in the whole room and the viewer lying down perceiving differently the film because now it is not just a video, it is an experience. She makes the walls disappears and creates a whole world in just four white walls. This transformation of space out of the box and her perspective of things really inspired me. Most of her video art consist women bodies but as she said in her interview her videos is about everyone and not only women. I have also watched this interview of her that talks about her work “Ever is Over All” (1997). In her video it’ s a girl that she is smashing car windows with a very heavy sculpture of a flower. In the interview she is saying that this piece came out from her anger about a weak moment in her life. I really liked her spontaneity and simplicity of her thinking and ideas. She just had an image in her mind when she was anger about a guy and she made that a piece of work.